CPC National Collection Plant Profile
|
Fremontodendron mexicanum
Family: |
Sterculiaceae |
Common Names: |
Mexican flannelbush, Mexican fremontia |
Author: |
A. Davids. |
Growth Habit: |
Tree, Shrub |
CPC
Number: |
1953 |
|
|
|
|
Primary
custodian for this plant in the CPC National Collection of Endangered
Plants is: |
|
Fremontodendron mexicanum
|
Fremontodendron mexicanum is a tree like shrub with bright orange flowers that bloom between March and August. The showy plant is often used as an ornamental shrub in gardens. Currently, fewer than 100 individuals are known from sites in two areas, southern San Diego County and Estado de Baja California, Mexico (USFWS 1998). Habitat loss and fragmentation are historical threats; remaining populations are now susceptible to inbreeding depression and alteration of fire regimes. Although Fremontodendron mexicanum is adapted to natural fire cycles, changes in fire frequency or timing may be detrimental to this specie's existence (USFWS 1998).
Distribution
& Occurrence |
|
State Range
Habitat
| |
Fremontodendron mexicanum occurs in closed-cone coniferous forests dominated by Cupressus forbesii and with mixed chaparral in southern California (USFWS 1995). |
Distribution
| |
Historically, its range extended from northern Baja California to Los Angeles County. Now, it is restricted to one site in Sand Diego County and Mexico (USFWS 1995, 1998). |
Number Left
| |
Less than 100 individuals are known from sites in San Diego County and Mexico. Reports of individuals growing in Los Angeles County are believed to be garden escapees (USFWS 1998). |
State/Area
Protection
| |
State/Area |
Rank |
Status |
Date |
|
| |
California |
S2.1 |
3 |
|
|
| |
Mexico |
*FR83 |
|
8/26/1988 |
|
Conservation,
Ecology & Research |
|
Ecological
Relationships
| |
Ecological relationships are widely unknown. There is circumstantial evidence for competition with an annual ryegrass and the possibility of negative effects incurred by frequent human caused fires (USFWS 1998). |
Threats
| |
Competition for water with an annual ryegrass that was introduced by the Department of Forestry after a fire. Alteration of fire natural fire patterns is a threat to seedlings, seed banks and regrowth (USFWS 1998). |
Current Research Summary
Current Management Summary
| |
The remaining population in San Diego County is under the protection of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), however, BLM does not have control over the entire habitat. Efforts to control human foot traffic (a potential source of accidental fires) have not been successful (USFWS 1998). |
Research Management Needs
| |
Remaining populations are on privately owned land that need protection. In addition to better understanding the fire effects, research needs include reproductive biology and ecology. |
Ex Situ Needs
|
Books (Single Authors)
|
|
Munz, P.A. 1974. A flora of southern California. Berkeley: Univ. California Press. 1086p.
|
|
Reiser, C.H. 1994. Rare Plants of San Diego County. Imperial Beach, CA: Aquafir Press.
|
|
Shreve, F.; Wiggins, I.L. 1964. Vegetation and flora of the Sonoran Desert. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press. 1740p.
|
|
Smith, J.P.; Berg, K. 1988. California native plant society's inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. Sacramento: California Native Plant Society. 168p.
|
|
Wiggins, I.L. 1980. Flora of Baja California. Stanford, California: Stanford Univ. Press. 1025p.
|
|
Books (Sections)
|
|
Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the U.S., Canada, and Greenland. In: Kartesz, J.T.; Meacham, C.A., editors. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden. Chapel Hill, NC.
|
|
Books (Edited Volumes)
|
|
James C. Hickman, Editor. 1993 The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1400p.
|
|
Electronic Sources
|
|
CDFG. (2002). California's Plants and Animals, Threatened and Endangered Plants. List and Species Accounts. California Department of Fish and Game, Habitat Conservation Planning Branch. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/hcpb/species/t_e_spp/teplant/teplanta.shtml. Accessed: 2002.
|
|
Journal Articles
|
|
Kelman, W.M. 1991. A Revision of Fremontodendron (Sterculiaceae). Systematic Botany. 16, 1: 3-20.
|
|
USFWS. 1995. Proposed endangered and threatened status for four chaparral plants from southwestern California and northwestern Baja California, Mexico. Federal Register. 60, 190: 51443-51452.
|
|
USFWS. 1998. Endangered or threatened status for three plants from the chaparral and scrub of southwestern California. Federal Register. 63, 197: 54956-54971.
|
|
Reports
|
|
Little, E.L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized): Agriculture Handbook No. 541. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Forest Service. p.375.
|
|
Pearson, D.C. 1989. Endangered species alert program manual: Species accounts and procedures. Southern California Edison Environmental Affairs Division.
|
|
Sanguamphai. 1989. 1988 Annual Report on the Status of California's State Listed Threatened and Endangered Plants and Animals. State of California, Department of Fish and Game.
|
|
Stephenson, John R.; Calcarone, Gena M. 1999. Southern California Mountains and Foothills Assessment: Habitat and Species Conservation Issues. Chapter 5 - Potentially Vulnerable Species: Plants. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. p.402. General Technical report PSW-GTR-172.
|
|
|
|
This
profile was updated on 3/4/2010 |
|